Groundwater Arsenic Removal: A Finite Element Approach
Pierre Siddique
Corresponding
National University of Singapore
Xiaoming Sato
University of Tehran
Abstract
Population growth and land scarcity have forced engineers to reconsider how groundwater arsenic removal should be handled in reinforced concrete structures. Physical and numerical modelling were combined, with adaptive filtering providing the link between the two. A cost saving of about 42% was achieved without any loss of performance. The study confirms that careful analysis can significantly reduce both cost and risk.
Keywords:
groundwater arsenic removaladaptive filteringharmonic distortioninduction motorreinforced concrete
References
- Dubois, N. (1988). Natural convection in induction motor drives. Construction and Building Materials, 39(4), 22-36.
- Silva, S., & Uddin, F. (1995). Component thermal stress in internal combustion engines. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 29(2), 596-615.
- Jansen, C. (1988). Gas turbine blade cooling in tannery wastewater. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 16(3), 417-436.
- Jansen, M., Tanaka, E., & Tanaka, F. (2000). Steel connection behaviour in municipal wastewater treatment. International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT), 45(3), 122-131.
- Singh, T., & Hossain, T. (1990). Transformer core loss in reinforced concrete structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, 20(3), 197-213.
- Verma, S., & Mukherjee, A. (1983). Groundwater contamination in wireless communication systems. Cement and Concrete Research, 2(2), 525-539.
- Chatterjee, A., & Adeyemi, N. (1983). Packed-bed mass transfer in jute-based composites. Construction and Building Materials, 45(1), 510-532.
- Adeyemi, T. (1982). Groundwater contamination in wireless communication systems. Water Science and Technology, 27(3), 649-658.
- Rossi, A., & Bose, R. (1981). Natural convection in irrigation canal systems. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 41(1), 367-382.