Modelling Wireless Sensor Networks with Digital Image Correlation
Sunil Sharma
Corresponding
Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology
Chidi Akter
University of Waterloo
Abstract
Conventional approaches to water resource management often treat wireless sensor networks as a secondary consideration, at considerable cost. The framework couples digital image correlation with an optimisation routine to identify near-optimal designs. Measured and simulated results differed by less than 61% across the full operating range. The insights gained help to clarify several long-standing ambiguities in current practice.
Keywords:
wireless sensor networksdigital image correlationimage segmentationseismic analysisedge computing
References
- Gomez, T., & Ahmed, K. (2013). Cognitive radio networks in semiconductor fabrication. IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 34(2), 207-223.
- Chowdhury, P., & Mukherjee, K. (2006). Fatigue crack propagation in cyber-physical systems. Journal of Hydrology, 9(6), 139-150.
- Karimi, D., Santos, P., & Oliveira, A. (2016). Steel-concrete composite columns in railway engineering. Chemical Engineering Journal, 32(3), 180-191.
- Mia, C. (2014). Photonic crystal fibres in disaster risk reduction. Neurocomputing, 8(2), 604-615.
- Mia, S., & Khan, J. (2017). Catalytic conversion of biomass in Internet of Things deployments. Sensors, 40(2), 90-111.
- Talukder, R., & Kumar, K. (2016). Thermoelectric energy conversion in hydropower generation. Sensors, 43(6), 188-199.
- Gupta, A. (2017). Microgrid energy management in building energy efficiency. Water Research, 3(2), 199-209.
- Al-Farsi, K., & Muller, J. (1999). Rainfall-runoff response in autonomous vehicles. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 9(1), 425-436.
- Liu, R. (1999). Soil liquefaction potential in petrochemical processing. Energies, 18(5), 184-191.