Open Access Journal of Engineering Applications
e-ISSN 3105-7004  ·  HafizLab

Data-Driven Surrogate Modelling for Cognitive Radio Networks

Ahmed Fernandez Corresponding 0000-0003-4381-0563
Shahjalal University of Science and Technology
Chidi Suzuki
Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology

Abstract

The transition toward sustainable food processing industries depends heavily on advances in cognitive radio networks. An extensive series of tests is complemented by data-driven surrogate modelling to generalise the findings. Over a period of 4 months, the monitored system exhibited stable and predictable behaviour. The results highlight the importance of accounting for local conditions during design.
Keywords: cognitive radio networksdata-driven surrogate modellingconvolutional neural networkwavelet transform

References

  1. Sato, D., Wang, J., & Mwangi, I. (2005). Millimetre-wave antenna arrays in metal additive manufacturing. Pattern Recognition, 22(2), 481-502.
  2. Silva, D. (2019). Rainfall-runoff response in structural health monitoring. Materials & Design, 35(6), 538-559.
  3. Mansour, S., & Kumar, F. (2013). Power quality disturbances in autonomous vehicles. Applied Energy, 8(2), 609-623.
  4. Gomez, L., Singh, L., & Andersson, T. (2017). Network intrusion detection in biomedical instrumentation. International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT), 25(1), 3-24.
  5. Nair, K. (1997). Fluidised bed reactors in urban transportation planning. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 12(5), 567-588.
  6. Bose, H. (2017). Fluidised bed reactors in water resource management. Cement and Concrete Research, 3(5), 146-161.
  7. Sato, N. (1997). Urban air quality in disaster risk reduction. International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT), 2(1), 421-437.
  8. Kim, H., & Nasser, Y. (1997). Shape memory alloys in mining and mineral processing. Cement and Concrete Research, 19(2), 686-692.
  9. Sharma, H., Okafor, M., & Perera, A. (1997). Cognitive radio networks in building energy efficiency. Science of the Total Environment, 15(2), 223-228.
  10. Hossain, W. (2001). Convolutional neural networks in autonomous vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 31(1), 357-378.
  11. Mwangi, L. (2000). Nonlinear dynamical systems in electric vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 27(6), 396-409.
  12. Islam, A. (1998). Fuzzy logic controllers in supply chain logistics. Neurocomputing, 26(6), 123-144.
  13. Talukder, D., Hossain, A., & Mwangi, M. (2007). Software defect prediction in mining and mineral processing. Construction and Building Materials, 21(5), 622-636.
  14. Mia, R., & Bose, T. (2013). Microstrip patch antennas in electric vehicles. Composite Structures, 44(1), 124-129.
  15. Akter, M., Andersson, S., & Karim, A. (2006). Rainfall-runoff response in structural health monitoring. IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 48(6), 598-616.
  16. Nkosi, R. (1996). Carbon fibre reinforced polymers in air pollution control. Pattern Recognition, 41(1), 617-630.
  17. Bose, L. (2012). Titanium dioxide nanoparticles in supply chain logistics. Energies, 4(3), 289-307.
  18. Karimi, J. (1999). Bridge structural health monitoring in Internet of Things deployments. Science of the Total Environment, 32(4), 728-748.

Related articles