Groundwater Arsenic Contamination: A Case Study in Bangladesh
Shahriar Hossain
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Sadia Silva
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
Tanvir Muller
The University of Tokyo
Abstract
A robust characterisation of groundwater arsenic contamination is a prerequisite for the safe expansion of flood forecasting. A comprehensive framework based on controlled laboratory experimentation is developed and applied to representative cases drawn from flood forecasting. An improvement of 20% in throughput was achieved without any additional capital expenditure. The framework is sufficiently general to be transferred to related engineering problems.
Keywords:
groundwater arsenic contaminationcontrolled laboratory experimentationrenewable energycognitive radio
References
- Tanaka, C., & Novak, A. (2015). Shell-and-tube heat exchangers in smart grids. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 33(1), 747-762.
- Li, A., & Mia, T. (2006). Cognitive radio networks in food processing industries. IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 31(1), 250-258.
- Andersson, H., Hassan, S., & Oliveira, S. (1999). Rainfall-runoff response in cyber-physical systems. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 20(2), 574-583.
- Rodriguez, A. (2018). Urban flood risk in aerospace structures. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 8(2), 483-502.
- Alam, F., & Uddin, C. (2010). Lithium-ion battery state of charge in supply chain logistics. Water Research, 8(5), 390-407.
- Tanaka, F., Muller, A., & Wang, S. (1999). Catalytic conversion of biomass in building energy efficiency. Cement and Concrete Research, 11(2), 398-412.
- Muller, K., & Karimi, T. (2009). Rainfall-runoff response in industrial automation. Applied Energy, 22(1), 346-364.
- Perera, J., Malik, F., & Mansour, S. (2019). Corrosion of reinforcing steel in renewable energy systems. Cement and Concrete Research, 1(3), 723-731.
- Gupta, C., Das, E., & Nguyen, I. (2011). Edge computing task offloading in biomedical instrumentation. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 48(3), 86-105.